Comparison using WAIC
P(Model 1 better than Model 2)=Φ(elpd_diff/se_diff)
prob_model_better <- function(elpd_diff, se_diff) {
z <- elpd_diff / se_diff
p <- pnorm(z)
return(p)
}
elpd_diff <- 5
se_diff <- 3
prob_model_better(elpd_diff, se_diff)
Result:
[1] 0.952
So there is approximately 95% probability that model 1 predicts better than model 2.
It is not the probability that the model is better — only that its predictive accuracy is higher.
You can use also the function Probability_Best_Model_WAIC() in HelpersMG packages that uses original loo results to compare the predictive accuracy of several models.
Commentaires
Enregistrer un commentaire